Fire Alarm Pathway Survivability Requirements: What’s New in NFPA 72 (2025)

Written By Shannon Sampson

Fire alarm and Emergency Communication Systems (ECS) must remain operational even when fire conditions compromise building infrastructure. NFPA 72 (2025) strengthens several requirements related to Pathway Survivability, especially for circuits responsible for occupant notification, monitoring, and emergency communication.

This guide breaks down what changed — and how designers, installers, and owners in Baton Rouge must respond.

1. What Is Pathway Survivability?

NFPA 72 defines survivability in Chapter 12, focusing on how fire alarm pathways must be protected against fire exposure long enough for building occupants to relocate, evacuate, or be notified.

When fire conditions threaten a cable run, riser, or communication pathway, survivability ensures the system:

  • Continues to transmit alarm/event signals

  • Remains monitored and supervised

  • Does not fail before evacuation is complete

2. Survivability Levels in NFPA 72 (2025)

Level 0 — No Protection

NFPA 72 §12.4.1
Used in low-risk areas where loss of signal would not adversely affect evacuation or emergency communication.

Level 1 — Sprinkler Protection

NFPA 72 §12.4.2
The pathway is installed within a fully sprinklered building, with wiring supported so sprinklers won’t damage it during discharge.

Level 2 — Two-Hour Protection

NFPA 72 §12.4.3
A pathway must be protected by ONE of the following:

  • CI (Circuit Integrity) cable

  • MI (Mineral-Insulated) cable

  • A 2-hour fire-resistive cable system

  • A 2-hour rated enclosure, conduit system, or gypsum assembly

  • Routing inside a 2-hour rated building space

This level is widely required for:

  • Stairwell communications

  • Areas of Refuge systems

  • Fire command center pathways

  • ECS (Mass Notification) circuits

Level 3 — Redundant Pathways

NFPA 72 §12.4.4
Requires two Level 2 pathways routed separately, providing total redundancy.

Used primarily in:

  • Mission-critical facilities

  • High-rise buildings

  • Complex campuses

  • Life-safety critical ECS systems

3. What Changed in NFPA 72 (2025)?

A. Clarified Language Around Cable Types

Designers now have explicit guidance on when CI cable is acceptable versus when a 2-hour assembly is required.

B. Integration With Networked Communicators

Pathways for:

  • cellular communicators

  • IP communicators

  • radio frequency nodes

…must now satisfy updated supervision requirements (§26.6.3–26.6.4).

C. Alignment With Building Codes

NFPA 72 now aligns more closely with IBC for:

  • Fire-resistive construction

  • Vertical risers

  • Fire command center requirements

  • ECS-rated spaces

D. Stronger AHJ Expectation for “Clear Documentation”

Plans must show:

  • The survivability level

  • The method of compliance

  • The construction detail or cable type used

  • The pathway routing

This is especially important for Louisiana State Fire Marshal plan submittals.

4. Practical Examples (Hybrid Technical + Contractor-Friendly)

Example 1 — Stairwell Notification Circuit

For a 6-story building in Baton Rouge:

  • The stairwell circuit must meet Level 2 survivability.

  • CI cable or 2-hour rated shaft routing is acceptable.

  • Documentation must show the chosen method.

Example 2 — ECS/MNS System in a Hospital

Hospitals require guaranteed communication under fire conditions.

  • Level 3 may be required depending on the system design.

  • Redundant CI cable pathways must be routed separately.

Example 3 — Small Business with Single Riser Path

Level 0 or 1 may be acceptable depending on system function and AHJ interpretation.

5. Why This Matters for Baton Rouge Facilities

Improper pathway survivability is a top reason for plan review rejections by the Louisiana State Fire Marshal.

It affects:

  • Hospitals & healthcare

  • Industrial plants

  • High-rise buildings

  • Schools

  • Dormitories

  • Government buildings

Survivability is not optional — it’s a life-safety requirement.

6. Capitol City Fire Protection’s Expertise

As NICET IV–led fire alarm specialists, we design and install systems that meet or exceed NFPA 72 (2025) survivability requirements.

Our team provides:

  • Code-compliant riser pathways

  • Survivability level documentation

  • CI/MI cable installation

  • Fire-rated cable routing solutions

  • Survivability verification during commissioning

Need NFPA 72 Survivability Expertise in Baton Rouge?

📞 (225) 242-9215
🌐 www.capitolcityfire.com


Capitol City Fire Protection & Life Safety, LLC
Protecting Louisiana with compliant, survivable fire alarm systems.

 

Shannon Sampson https://capitolcityfire.com
Previous

Mass Notification Updates: What’s New in NFPA 72 (2025)
Next

How to Plan and Budget for NFPA 72 (2025) in Louisiana: A Comprehensive Guide for Facility Managers